Blind Mole Rat Wins Lotto, Plans Disneyland Trip

By Rape Lansky►

Naked Photo of the Mole Rat

A mole rat based in Langley is British Columbia's newest millionaire, winning the jackpot in last Saturday's Lotto Max draw.

The first thing the mole rat plans to do with her $1 million prize is take a trip to Disneyland.

"I've always wanted to go," said the mole rat in a press release from BC Lottos. "I'm taking all my children and grandchildren."

The mole rat obtained her winning ticket at a Circle-K confectionary adjacent to which she lives. The win is all the more inspiring in that the mole rat is blind. She has never seen light or dark. 

"I was getting bored sitting around talking about the weather," the blind mole rat said. "This is my deliverance."

Photo Credit: Uploaded by Jedimentat44 on flickr., CC BY 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

Hypotheses on the Hockey Canada Scandal

By Stephen Kunk►

Hockey Canada has been recently wracked with scandal on account of allegations regarding group sexual assaults. Approximately a week ago, the organization opened an investigation into an alleged assault on a woman by members of the 2018 World Junior national team in London, Ontario. More recently, Hockey Canada has begun dealing with other group assault allegations involving the 2003 World Junior team. Canadian hockey fans, worshippers of the great god Puck, have faced nothing less than a disruption of the psyche as a result.

Most pronouncedly, they've been confronted with harrowing questions. What members of the 2018 and 2003 junior teams participated in the assaults? What did any given member of the team do to the women involved? In the absence of details, the imagination runs wild.

In 2003, did Carlo Colaiacovo drive hard into the woman, as if she were an opposing defender in the corner? Did Jordin Tootoo gently grip the woman's ankle in his fist? Was Marc-Andre Fleury tender and loving with his thrusts? Did Scottie Upshall place kisses on the woman's mouth? Did Joffrey Lupul tongue the woman's aureole? Did Kyle Wellwood hike up her thighs? Did Matthew Stajan hold the woman's leg, offering Colaiacovo a more fulsome ingress?

Cale Makar

In 2003, did Sam Steel pull up mounds of flesh from the woman's buttocks? Did Drake Batherson heft her breasts as if adjudging a cantaloupe's ripeness? Did Cale Makar rear back more and more with each thrust, gradually building to a manic pace and mindbending climax?

More broadly, is there some kind of ritual group sex involved in representing Canada as a young male hockey player?

Obviously, Hockey Canada has spent a lot of time, effort, and tax-payer money to cover up these details, leaving our burning questions unanswered. And while the answer may be "yes" to many or all of the aforementioned questions, we have to look at the imbroglio through a wider lens, namely that of Canadian majoritarian culture and the kinds of impulses it tacitly sanctions.

Yes, the players who participated in the assaults are responsible for their actions. But we must ask: were they acting/assaulting as a function of a greater overarching impetus? Could it be that each thrust was actually authored by a system of males (and maleness) that must protect its own in the process of protecting a sport driven by male conquest? Most likely. Could it be that the players on the 2003 and 2018 teams were pawns, thrusting headlong simply on account of the momentum generated by a legacy—a lineage—of Canadian hockey patriarchs? It would seem that these young boys enacted a "frat-house mentality" fostered and nurtured by hoary old hockey men bent on preserving the rapacious spirit of their glory days. All told, Canada's hockey heads have almost become like a bunch of heterosexual Catholic priests.

Because in Canada, hockey itself is maleness (at least in conservative quarters). To be male at the highest level in the Great White North is to penetrate women in serial among other men. So yes, the individual players involved do need to be held accountable, but remember that every thrust they took upon the victim was ultimately enabled and compelled by an all-seeing, overarching elderly male gaze. The problem is not just the assault, but more than that the ubiquitous ho-hoing and snickering and arm-nudging with respect to this kind of ferociously homosocial sexuality preferred by hockey players, and the fact that it will go on as long as Canadian boys and men lace up the skates.

No matter who did what, don't expect any substantive punishments for the players, particularly not for the 2018 team. After all, these boy-men aren't people like you, dear reader, or your present author. Many of these men have gone onto NHL careers, and hence they are assets with exorbitant contracts, not to mention advertising deals. There is a lot of money bound up in each of these automatons, thereby precluding them from receiving the kinds of life-altering punishments that would meet your average non-hockey playing sex offender.

Photo Credit: Quintin Soloviev, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

Pierre Poilievre Auditioned for I Spit on Your Grave

By Stephen Kunk►

Canadian Conservative politician Pierre Poilievre is a promising Prime Ministerial hopeful and a master debater, but did you know that he is also an accomplished actor?

Poilievre auditioned for a number of film roles in the early to mid 2000s as his political career was on the rise. Most notably, he auditioned for the 2010 remake of I Spit on Your Grave, the notorious 1978 rape-revenge epic.

Poilievre specifically tried for the role of Sheriff Storch, the law officer to whom the victim, Jennifer, appeals after she is harassed by four local Republicans. When Storch finds drugs and alcohol at Jennifer's cabin, he casts doubt on her story. When the four other Republicans return to the cabin (spoiler alert), Storch joins them in sexually assaulting Jennifer. Jennifer spends the latter portion of the film taking revenge on her rapists, finishing up with Sheriff Storch.

After initial auditions, Poilievre pinned down the Storch role.

"Pierre had an attack-dog viciousness that brought a verity to the character," said director Steven R. Monroe. "He projected authority via volatility."

Unfortunately, Poilievre had to be replaced for the part by Welsh actor Andrew Howard. When Poilievre arrived in Louisiana for principal photography, he expressed discontent with the direction of the script.

"He wanted to change the ending," Monroe reported. "He insisted that the Sheriff should survive and kill the victim and go on with his family life. That was the only morally viable ending, in Pierre's view."

Even though it didn't work out for Poilievre as an actor, true conservatives hope he can win the role of Prime Minister so he can bring his rabid and rapacious reactionary values to Canada's highest office.

Photo Credit: Manning Centre c/o: Jake Wright, CC BY 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

Florida Meth Addict Solicits Sex from Manatee at Public Beach

By Rape Lansky►

Robert Thurston Thomas was arrested last Saturday at Fort Walton Beach in Florida after attempting to solicit sex from a manatee in broad daylight.

Fort Walton Beach Police responded to reports of a heavily intoxicated man causing a disturbance on a public beach in John Beasley Park in the mid-morning. Eye witnesses claim that Thomas, age 51, was throwing hundred-dollar bills at a beached manatee and loudly describing sexual acts he wanted the animal to perform upon him. When police found Thomas, a resident of nearby Destin, he had removed his beach shorts and was attempting to mount the male manatee. 

Officers pulled Thomas off the manatee and arrested him. Upon confiscating Thomas's vehicle, they found a cache of crystal meth in the backseat with a street value of approximately $10000. Thomas will appear in Okaloosa County courthouse later this week facing charges of public intoxication and drug possession. 

Marine biologists from Northwest Florida State College who tended to the manatee deemed it to be startled but otherwise unharmed. The manatee has since been released back into the waters, with hopes that this gentle sea creature will never again encounter the wilds of the Florida panhandle.

Who's Funding the Freedom Convoy?

By Stephen Kunk►

Last week, a so-called "Freedom Convoy" rolled into Ottawa, the capital city of Canada. The convoy consists of embittered uber-conservatives who want to protest vaccine mandates pertaining to long-haul truckers. Their chosen methodology of protest involves parking their rigs in the main throughways of Canada's capital, thereby causing gridlock and drawing attention to their cause. Their abiding goal was and is to have an audience with Justin Trudeau, who is no less than their Dark Lord of Mordor, and get him to end the mandate. 

Thousands of people assembled in protest over the previous weekend, but no meeting has come of it to date. Some of the protesters did, however, manage to desecrate a war memorial and wreck up a soup kitchen for the homeless. And when Confederate flags and swastikas showed up among the protesters, everyone was too caught up in protesting vaccines to call out the racists and direct them elsewhere. Obviously, the protesters have their priorities, and, evidently, a vaccine in a pandemic is a greater evil than white supremacy.

Six days have passed, and a significant percentage of the "Freedom Convoy" remains in Ottawa, still clogging the downtown core. Their ever-blaring horns and generally boorish comportment have incensed local businesses and residents, who have found it difficult to go about their daily routines. The noise is disorienting, and not just from the trucks. The hayseeds who have hunkered down in protest are perpetually primed to rave on about "freedom," one of two f-words they throw around with brio. When asked by reporters how long they plan to stay, these sons of the soil consistently reply with the phrase "as long as it takes," the word "it" being a sort of floating signifier for their "goal," which likely changes in correlation with mood swings of the group, or at least those of their alpha dog.

And while the consensus among most Canadians is likely that these people have (a) made their point and (b) are entirely rebarbative, this convoy apparently has the means to continue their protest indefinitely. But where would an assemblage of low proles get the funding to effectively camp out on public throughways for an entire work week and beyond? The answer lies in a GoFundMe page that has, to date, raised almost $10 million for the "cause." 

But our initial question has hardly been answered. How can a bunch of grossly misinformed high-school graduate anti-vaxxers spare even small percentages of their meager earnings to fund a convoy of cotton-eyed joes? That, too, remains unanswerable. The mainstream media (which this commentator doesn't distrust) claim that much of the funding is coming from foreign parties. And if that is indeed the case, we can safely assume that much of the donated money is coming from deeper pockets higher up on the paleoconservative food-chain. Donald Trump Jr. has spoken in favor of the convoy; so too has Elon Musk. And while it's not inconceivable these personages have contributed money to the convoy, this commentator has his doubts that a Trump or a Musk would want anything more than a little piece of the spotlight here, as per past precedent. Rather, I would suggest an alternative funding force.

Major funding for this Freedom Convoy, I hypothesize, is coming from Peter Thiel. The German-born Thiel is one of the lesser luminaries among the planet's billionaires, but he possesses an unabashed mean-streak that puts the comparably cool Bezos, Branson, and Musk to shame. Moreover, the man maintains an almost autistic obsession with "freedom," one that resonates with that of the crackers currently protesting in Ottawa. Indeed, Thiel has said on record that he "no longer believe[s] freedom and democracy are compatible." This is very much in goose-step with the beliefs of the convoy. But beyond the freedom-at-all-costs ideology, Thiel also aligns with the cornpone convoy in methodology. He, too, is familiar with wars of attrition. He famously provided $10 million dollars to help Hulk Hogan prevail in a lawsuit against Gawker, seemingly in response to that news outlet having run articles on Thiel's sexual orientation. I submit that Thiel or his subsidiary channels might be supporting the convoy in a similar capacity. Just as the convoy's protesters are intent to draw from their vast riches of free time in hope that their opposition caves, Thiel is intent to contribute vast amounts of his money until an adversary has no choice but to give up. Thiel just might be contributing to this particular cause in the name of "freedom," an abstraction he loves so dearly that he's willing to give up democracy in order to realize it.

Now, I want to make it clear that what I am stating here is an hypothesis. I am not claiming, in conspiracy theory fashion, that Peter Thiel is without doubt funding the Freedom Convoy. God knows there is enough misinformation floating around on the internet—in fact, it's largely what drove the convoy to Ottawa in the first place—and I don't wish to add to it. But my hypothesis is, nonetheless, worth considering. Follow the money, and I'm willing to bet hundreds that some of those millions put behind the Freedom Convoy will ultimately be traceable to Peter Thiel.

Photo Credit: Dan Taylor / Heisenberg Media, CC BY 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons